Security and data practices
AI workflow agents need clear limits on what they can access and do. Service Time Lab designs security controls around each project’s workflow, data, systems, users, and risk.
Separate access for engineers and agents
Our forward-deployed approach brings engineers close to your workflow. Engineering access should be authorized for named people and environments, limited to the agreed scope, and reviewed during delivery.
At handoff, access should be removed, transferred, or reduced. Engineer access and agent permissions should be documented separately for their respective roles.
Controls shaped by the workflow
The following practices guide project design and should be agreed before production use.
Map data and provider use
Document what information the agent receives, where it is stored, which providers process it, and what is logged. Identify relevant provider settings and retention options before launch, and review decisions as terms and capabilities change.
Limit data and system access
Use only the information, identities, tools, and permissions the workflow needs. Mask or exclude sensitive fields where practical. Enforce authorization in application code, independently of model instructions.
Keep consequential actions reviewable
Define when the agent must pause for an authorized person to approve, edit, reject, or take over. Include high-impact actions, unusual requests, and uncertain results in the review rules.
Protect credentials
Use the deployment environment’s approved method for managing secrets. Keep passwords, API keys, and connection strings out of prompts, public client code, and source control.
Test and trace behavior
Test representative and failure cases. Where appropriate, record tool use, errors, approvals, and outcomes to support review and improvement. Restrict access to these records because they may contain business information.
Plan for failure
Define timeouts, retry limits, checks on results, fallback behavior, and escalation. The workflow should handle unavailable systems and incomplete or incorrect model output without continuing indefinitely or failing silently.
Guidance that informs the work
Where relevant, project design may draw on:
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework
- NIST Generative AI Profile
- OWASP guidance for LLM and agentic applications
These references do not imply certification or formal compliance.
Talk through your data and access needs
Describe the workflow, the systems involved, and where human approval matters. We’ll help assess the scope and controls the project would need.
A high-level description is enough. Please leave out confidential or sensitive data.
Discuss Your Workflow